The US Supreme Court ruled March 26 in Florida v. Jardines that an alert from a drug-sniffing dog on a suspect's front porch constitutes a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. The ruling upheld the Florida Supreme Court, which held that evidence gathered pursuant to search warrant obtained based on the positive alert from the dog must be suppressed because the dog's presence itself constituted a warrantless search. The case stemmed from a 2006 incident in which Miami police and DEA agents, acting on a tip, place the home of Joelis Jardines under warrantless surveillance. Following the canine alert, a warrant was obtained, which uncovered Jardines' indoor grow operaiton.
Recent comments
7 weeks 5 days ago
11 weeks 5 days ago
12 weeks 6 days ago
12 weeks 6 days ago
34 weeks 1 hour ago
38 weeks 1 day ago
39 weeks 5 days ago
39 weeks 5 days ago
1 year 4 hours ago
1 year 5 weeks ago